From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concurrency, again Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:28:04 +0300 Message-ID: <83funkwfzf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <86k2dk77w6.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <9D64B8EA-DB52-413D-AE6A-264416C391F3@iotcl.com> <83int1g0s5.fsf@gnu.org> <83twckekqq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477412920 26487 195.159.176.226 (25 Oct 2016 16:28:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 25 18:28:36 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz4aY-0006Fc-Ai for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:28:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56394 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz4aa-0004md-GW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:28:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz4aR-0004k0-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:28:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz4aQ-0008SH-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:28:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz4aQ-0008SB-9m; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:28:26 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1390 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bz4aN-0006cb-HR; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:28:26 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Philipp Stephani on Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:27:39 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208783 Archived-At: > From: Philipp Stephani > Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:27:39 +0000 > > I very strongly disagree. I think "merge what we have and make it work" is the > wrong approach. (Since then, John changed his mind.) > I agree, there should at least be some more discussion about the design we want. IMO, we don't have Emacs-specific experience for such discussions. So these discussions will most probably lead nowhere. My suggestion is to "learn by doing", collect experience, and _then_ discuss the design issues based on that experience.