unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: xr
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:18:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83ftsyrbna.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvd0o3szvz.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 07 Feb 2019 22:50:59 -0500)

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 22:50:59 -0500
> 
> > The point is when someone contributes changes to Emacs which consist
> > of a separate module -- so that it isn't clearly "a change to Emacs"
> > -- we should ask per to affirm explicitly that it _is_ a change to
> > Emacs, and therefore his assignment covers it.
> 
> In the past we've considered explicit requests to contribute the package
> to Emacs or GNU ELPA as being such a statement.

And if that is not enough for some reason, then what exactly should
the contributor of a package say, and where, to express such a
statement?

Also, there are packages distributed with Emacs which can be
considered not "clearly" a change to Emacs -- should the same policy
be used for them?  E.g., Gnus or Org or ERC -- they are add-ons that
have no direct effect on the Emacs core.



  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-08  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-01 14:09 [ELPA] New package: xr Mattias Engdegård
2019-02-01 15:25 ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2019-02-01 15:42   ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-01 18:39     ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2019-02-01 15:51   ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-02-01 18:41     ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2019-02-02  9:43       ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-02-02 15:15         ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-02-02 18:41           ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2019-02-03  9:37             ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-02-03 20:11             ` Juri Linkov
2019-02-03 21:04               ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-02-03 21:13               ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2019-02-05 16:15 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-02-05 22:37   ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-02-06  0:04     ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-02-05 23:00   ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-02-06  0:11     ` Stefan Monnier
2019-02-06  0:25       ` Noam Postavsky
2019-02-06  0:34         ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-02-06  1:36         ` Stefan Monnier
2019-02-06 12:43       ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-02-07  4:34         ` pcre2el Richard Stallman
2019-02-07  7:11           ` pcre2el John Wiegley
2019-02-07 14:54           ` pcre2el Stefan Monnier
2019-02-06  0:02   ` [ELPA] New package: xr Mattias Engdegård
2019-02-06  0:14     ` Stefan Monnier
2019-02-06  7:02   ` Richard Stallman
2019-02-06 15:39     ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-07  4:36       ` Richard Stallman
2019-02-07 14:37         ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-08  3:21           ` Richard Stallman
2019-02-08  3:50             ` Stefan Monnier
2019-02-08  7:18               ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2019-02-08 10:06                 ` Stephen Berman
2019-02-09  3:37                   ` Richard Stallman
2019-02-09  8:03                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-09  3:38                 ` Richard Stallman
2019-02-09  8:05                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-10  5:51                     ` Richard Stallman
2019-02-10 15:12                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-11  5:38                         ` Richard Stallman
2019-02-10  5:51                     ` Richard Stallman
2019-02-10 15:14                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-09  3:37               ` Richard Stallman
2019-02-27 15:06 ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-02-27 16:22   ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-02-27 17:09     ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-02-28 14:10       ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-02-28 14:34         ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2019-02-28 23:06         ` Stefan Monnier
2019-03-01 13:39           ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-03-01 13:51             ` Stefan Monnier
2019-03-01  5:29         ` Van L
2019-03-01 13:54           ` Stefan Monnier
2019-03-01 15:25         ` Michael Heerdegen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83ftsyrbna.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).