From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BIKESHED: completion faces Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 20:16:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83ftizeelw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h83ignrz.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftj2gma8.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhhaxalt.fsf@gmail.com> <83bltpgffr.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv7gg9oz.fsf@gnu.org> <83r22kg8pa.fsf@gnu.org> <20191106205133.njij3ve7qqy7yh3q@Ergus> <83ftizg4nr.fsf@gnu.org> <8336ezg2vm.fsf@gnu.org> <83wocbelu1.fsf@gnu.org> <83imnvegcp.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="169232"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: spacibba@aol.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 07 19:17:05 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iSmLA-000hqB-QU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 19:17:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46932 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSmL9-0006Xb-LH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSmL3-0006Vv-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:16:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSmL2-0000Gk-4V; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:16:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3853 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iSmL1-0005Vy-FA; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:16:55 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= on Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:53:02 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241947 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:53:02 +0000 > Cc: Ergus , emacs-devel , > Stefan Monnier , Dmitry Gutov > > > > "first-difference" to "completion-emphasis" and > > > "common-part" to "secondary-emphasis" > > > > I think secondary-emphasis is not a good name, it says nothing about > > its use. We should find a better name. > > "alternate-emphasis"? Same problem. How about "match-emphasis"?