From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pull requests Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:04:50 +0300 Message-ID: <83ftdq3sel.fsf@gnu.org> References: <49236D54-08F9-4665-97A9-07A351DB0977@icloud.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="13599"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, Emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: =?utf-8?B?7KGw7ISx67mI?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 30 15:05:30 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jIu6c-0003S4-5r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:05:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49362 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIu6b-00008L-7H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:05:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIu5y-00086U-St for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:04:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43498) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIu5x-0000eU-Rg; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:04:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3955 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jIu5p-0003az-BN; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:04:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49236D54-08F9-4665-97A9-07A351DB0977@icloud.com> (message from =?utf-8?B?7KGw7ISx67mI?= on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:25:26 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245999 Archived-At: > From: 조성빈 > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:25:26 +0900 > Cc: Dmitry Gutov , eliz@gnu.org, cpitclaudel@gmail.com, > Emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Suppose A sends B a URL pointing to a branch with non-installed > > patches. If A doesn't warn B, or if A is too terse and does not make the > > point clear, B will not know it is non-installed. B will only see > > that it is in the standard GNU Emacs repo. > > If GNU hosts a forge with PR support working similar to GitHub or GitLab, the URL won’t point to the standard GNU Emacs repo, it will point to a custom fork (which IMHO nobody can really confuse). I think Dmitry was arguing for having this in the Emacs repository. Having a separate hosting server, especially one that is on SOMETHING.nongnu.org, was already agreed to, so no reason to argue about that.