From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 21:03:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83ftcr788t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <97DA7804-F647-4A1D-B8E0-AFFE7A324C64@gmail.com> <87d07xamrg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878silajdl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tv18pyh4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83tv1883fu.fsf@gnu.org> <87eesb8nuj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="4745"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 25 20:04:55 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jSPAd-000198-G7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 20:04:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42428 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSPAc-0007FF-IA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:04:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSP9m-0005zt-P7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSP9m-0002Jq-Am; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2567 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jSP9k-0007L2-NS; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:04:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87eesb8nuj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (message from Eric Abrahamsen on Sat, 25 Apr 2020 10:41:24 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247808 Archived-At: > From: Eric Abrahamsen > Cc: Clément Pit-Claudel , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 10:41:24 -0700 > > >> git log --format="%aE" | sort | uniq ? > > > > This needs to be audited to exclude people who don't have assignment. > > I suppose listing committer instead of author would do it > (--format="%cE"), since we're literally only interested in who can > commit. Are we? I thought this was about knowing when a contributor has an assignment on file, for people who don't have access to "the file" itself. Most contributors who went through the legal paperwork and assigned copyright to the FSF don't have write access to the repository.