From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Changes for emacs 28
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:04:50 +0300
Message-ID: <83ft7oh63h.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20200910231420.kvqg6ohvxetpup5c.ref@Ergus>
 <20200910231420.kvqg6ohvxetpup5c@Ergus> <83zh5whl5p.fsf@gnu.org>
 <d04ebde3-be59-7498-b9e1-806be5e249c6@yandex.ru> <83mu1whac7.fsf@gnu.org>
 <a7bf390b-cf41-aeb5-b253-c7123510c127@yandex.ru> <83imckh9yt.fsf@gnu.org>
 <f5d602b1-4eec-c301-5ff7-4329d602fb67@yandex.ru>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="9441"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: rekado@elephly.net, ghe@sdf.org, spacibba@aol.com, drew.adams@oracle.com,
 emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 11 14:05:31 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kGho2-0002Kz-S0
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:05:30 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41978 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kGho1-0006Au-TQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:05:29 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54912)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1kGhnU-0005et-Ln
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:04:56 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35187)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kGhnT-0005K6-0g; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:04:55 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3885 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kGhnS-0003P4-8w; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:04:54 -0400
In-Reply-To: <f5d602b1-4eec-c301-5ff7-4329d602fb67@yandex.ru> (message from
 Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:09:17 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255150
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/255150>

> Cc: rekado@elephly.net, ghe@sdf.org, spacibba@aol.com, drew.adams@oracle.com,
>  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:09:17 +0300
> 
> On 11.09.2020 13:41, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > If people prefer that, we could change the binding, I won't object.
> 
> But then we'll have no binding for `undo-redo`, just a menu item?
> 
> Or would you be fine with adding a binding for it too?

Why do we need a binding for it in the default configuration?  Not
every command available through the menus has a keybinding by default.