From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: News from the lexical world Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:24:16 +0300 Message-ID: <83fszv3abj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834kgc4ykj.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtu33ea7.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27260"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, raman@google.com To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 12 15:25:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lVwZe-0006rg-3i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:25:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53026 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVwZd-0005sf-5c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:25:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVwYM-0004r2-Qt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:24:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVwYL-0000Fa-S6; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:24:33 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2943 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lVwYJ-0004EM-II; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:24:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:58:04 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267959 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, raman@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:58:04 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Andrea Corallo > >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , raman@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:34:37 +0000 > >> > >> But we can say that the native compiler works better on lexical code as > >> on dynamic one just gives-up on any Lisp optimization :) > > > > Yes, this should definitely be documented. > > Where do you think would be the best place to document it? Where we describe lexical-binding in the ELisp manual, I think.