From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tick Reduction Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 21:49:18 +0200 Message-ID: <83fsrpqog1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> <8735nszpdv.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfvswrp8.fsf@gnus.org> <834k88woaj.fsf@gnu.org> <878rxkv980.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfvpmtl8.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmqtqvj5.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl2dmnfa.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtlxquh7.fsf@gnu.org> <877dd1mlsd.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0h1qss5.fsf@gnu.org> <8735npmkm5.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7c5qpag.fsf@gnu.org> <87czmtl2uv.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18660"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 21 20:49:48 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mosqS-0004eo-Mr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 20:49:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43110 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mosqQ-0004CL-RC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 14:49:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mospu-0003WO-AU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 14:49:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=32870 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mospt-0008Pd-Ku; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 14:49:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ylaxsl2tXiSCdkIoqd8zw9Y0PxzuVJnPmximtpVD0l4=; b=R8h0gJP3MwfU MXYKjaO/jCx0+PfhTQQ85dW6NqNtmUgRfnAzt/6jpOb1izA9ojqPY+hCHuURA7iGfGPWWQAceCuvD H5vOEwUhF/e8IWgKRS86YZ/i9I1j54VkVVyLuyR8S+dEBTtclXbguFnhUwidBYa77ytFrK7v8VhmF VERkHiLc8Q8n5DYeqROeF+cTwAnOhW0YhfY3HGBW8Zdo/5EIpQ9drsZ3/3mXVN45G1VMJfaeisxUF nu8erE5HgtUH4+88T1pAwasnks6QxdHucNBY+EqOZjE8XCXuSzUTZgLiz7MIiXA+JZwI7XWfSjtNv vWvbResaYLBOoxrZFVRguw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2568 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mosps-0004NZ-JY; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 14:49:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87czmtl2uv.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 21 Nov 2021 20:34:32 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279880 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 20:34:32 +0100 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru > > The entire mode line should use the same proportional font. Bits that > are liable to shift around should be monospacialised, and the only parts > that shift around are the "U:---" bit at the start and the line/column > bits (including spacers at the end). My mode line where I type this looks like this: -\**- *mail* Bot L30 (Mail Fly/en Abbrev Fill) 9:41PM 0.08 [100%] So the "-\**" part, the Top/nn%/Bot part, the L30 part, the 9:41PM part, the 0.08 part, and the [100%] part will have to use the fixed advance width? And do you know which character's width should we take as the "standard" width for this purpose? Btw, I still don't think I understand why aligning each field to a certain pixel value would not look better (and be easier to implement).