From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: etags name collision. Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 18:51:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83fsmj62jl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20220411124736.3qijvtearh6wlen7.ref@Ergus> <20220411124736.3qijvtearh6wlen7@Ergus> <83pmln69n0.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411134749.ps6g5ulpbamzm6ot@Ergus> <83k0bv679q.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411154635.qfw2ijpdahiv5ctl@Ergus> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29141"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 11 17:53:02 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ndwLc-0007Lw-7o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:53:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57634 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndwLb-0004yN-6U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:52:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndwKa-0003bg-P2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:51:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42086) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndwKZ-00026E-T3; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:51:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=UEmM5QrMNysEP5PylhM6XRoFlWa9pyQyVNnBsB0i2pA=; b=iFN3h1KxoOa5 m+qklBLmLJiT2/PKwpKc3aaGDfPoLQmMnio0cLSu/imw4mBEySAzbEVfHHu9bnbWLJ4+Iths42Bxd HP0gYNeqDgcy+fMi6dxhAcpsQsm+mQR/yCERutBTiGJAf6wMtXURcxMG4MhwQ2CDVtWTLZ4QxCEex rQrXfnv3GhvVk07ZgMLH3TpPN6nlQcsXxyLAvBb43BczCwQdYzYYX+h3L9lVvm9Md4lix2M+DQref C+I96dmdOhTmSzlRwiq9nVorjjP84ziazkBBj7YitoR5ktdg2QuIkkRakzzl9afcWw+Ddtwb/ELhq H2fqR9DR6VWTQ8uXJlaAHg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2583 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndwKZ-0001Dv-DA; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:51:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20220411154635.qfw2ijpdahiv5ctl@Ergus> (message from Ergus on Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:46:35 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288221 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:46:35 +0200 > From: Ergus > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >I'm opposed to dropping stuff just because we can. If you want to add > >an option not to install ctags if another version is installed > >(similarly to what we do with movemail), that's fine. > > What about the attached patch? The code should test whether another version of 'ctags' is already installed, and if so, that it isn't our 'ctags'. _Then_ we could default to not installing our 'ctags'. Your proposal doesn't make that test, so please add it. Thanks.