From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding missing C-x 5 C-j and C-x t C-j commands Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 05:24:38 +0300 Message-ID: <83fsl16l5l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a6b9xs22.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22420"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sean Whitton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 23 04:25:43 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nsxlO-0005eV-Kt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 23 May 2022 04:25:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39724 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nsxlN-0004Zg-DB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 May 2022 22:25:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nsxkb-0003u3-2M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2022 22:24:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nsxka-0007FR-Oa; Sun, 22 May 2022 22:24:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=mLHFKqqCOjh0Vr7nj8GbX7196f/fTu6RaQPdWPPZ18c=; b=JSCwEOo+nLA0 U3QdQXBSNKi5m3Q1rQWvFOz4uQ+2yexQvwp9YSXrlAtAEfY7VyItqVjG+a1dP+Elnuik+yAQHnrOH tltgRYFu6wX1QLEzMS4UO7hV3ID/eVKp3woTWwu7iPNN7uqX/JMd58Zr1sM5qOEi3pGBsaPi4cE9J A9RaygldrxC/BLmnlNbeT9YNKqVbBdsNn2nxA0bKR8eNDAuUeEm1byQfLTt39TpKDdW86TQoW44kB IZFZSDRF3OrwZAWUNdfjI5/xbLFyciK5+HkiDW3SLmF04L1lJKQ0aKb5xFxRtxrNEjik7LE/EFQlO vxxv7bCufldswofFSnGJ9Q==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4002 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nsxka-0001Cf-69; Sun, 22 May 2022 22:24:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a6b9xs22.fsf@athena.silentflame.com> (message from Sean Whitton on Sun, 22 May 2022 12:53:25 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290114 Archived-At: > From: Sean Whitton > Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 12:53:25 -0700 > > We have C-x d, C-x 4 d, C-x 5 d and C-x t d, but only C-x C-j > and C-x 4 C-j. My fingers try to use C-x 5 C-j, and find it isn't > there, at least biweekly. Here is a draft patch to fill the gap. We have the "C-x 5 5" prefix for purposes like this one.