From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Edebug corrupting point in buffers.
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 05:28:48 +0200
Message-ID: <83fsf2avbj.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <Y2A9NINYSfByTztE@ACM> <83wn8fcgvd.fsf@gnu.org>
 <Y2EFztE/GgFF0P3x@ACM> <83iljydh7e.fsf@gnu.org> <Y2EiK32B9lxLSFms@ACM>
 <838rkud9d5.fsf@gnu.org> <Y2FSHvmj2H8a5AS6@ACM>
 <83v8nybnuk.fsf@gnu.org> <Y2FWSoSCQnnY9en1@ACM>
 <83pme6bls8.fsf@gnu.org> <Y2FtQMonpNeR1m1k@ACM>
 <jwv7d0e3235.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="20114"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 02 04:29:29 2022
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1oq4RU-00054P-8b
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 04:29:28 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1oq4R5-0006KH-6D; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:29:03 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1oq4R3-0006Jr-C7
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:29:01 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1oq4R3-0001Mo-2X; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:29:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=hMCRIeGQYN/jFd+BBZnrXHhilA9MrvTNWZ85NG561Tk=; b=e4Njg+/kfOWw
 +fO1zZPc3PizOWb5E+a6qXlMjUhJDA/ItEP2IebGAXISc8yAbEM5sxjdBVJfOsswY3WX9GGjXiDhQ
 J9kphIrDAXgphxXJ0jPmgD9A4r13qbpH+SnNbbRMeOOi3kZUOiWmZP2vAbzby1e6iPhmICwbFgX6z
 CoA5FwkY68UDHiK4dknPsEBuEXUJ5f/MOEq6Zl+jFyU0f+9dUfX08K26jFgh9egw0bQJbZaB5CkCi
 yDSSKkij7pIT7wQvps3brgMr9EPCE/sGAxY8dlfUPzW3x6/VPbkJANg/8faId5VDmwu3C7wns0Ekr
 YpuCfDPjSDvxj2Nu4QTwmA==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1oq4R2-0005ie-1g; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:29:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <jwv7d0e3235.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
 Monnier on Tue, 01 Nov 2022 15:47:45 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298991
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/298991>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 15:47:45 -0400
> 
> > Why does set-window-configuration overwrite the buffer-points?  The
> > window configuration does not contain them.  The code just assumes that
> > the buffer-point should be set to the window point.  Of course, we have
> > a race condition if a buffer is displayed in several windows.  So this
> > would appear to be a bug, the root cause of the bug in this thread.
> 
> This suggests the patch below, right?

I hope not.  We should not change behavior of set-window-configuration
easily, certainly not due to this problem.  I'm against this patch,
sorry.