From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keep network security info buffers after use Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 20:51:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83frzq9kv9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87plz4irev.fsf@red-bean.com> <83frzufo9x.fsf@gnu.org> <838r5jd56w.fsf@gnu.org> <87mstzwr5j.fsf@red-bean.com> <834jg7d0p2.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6k6chhq.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13236"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 25 19:52:08 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rHq3c-0003D0-9Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2023 19:52:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHq2i-0005Ks-U0; Mon, 25 Dec 2023 13:51:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHq2h-0005Kc-3y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2023 13:51:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHq2g-00061Z-DG; Mon, 25 Dec 2023 13:51:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=yQ9mbNG33Y2rnM8BYy7dCwCZO79i6WuJG+VcSRHCv9I=; b=GCU1Zz8TjOnKBdI4rO9Z ZMp1tk5qUO1no/6eHcu9+vdC8zp3rBDzKgF0T18OJEQXZuuSePIhx8Z0aSwA4fGlBAgGX60FFNcw1 9FSrDp8HlxfCPwQgp1DCnCWu4si18YR71BaYDBdT6EPckVt8O3cS127bKqkwueUJx1TP4N39Nta9z FNHF5a5Nc0s3/vUMbPDcjXe3lsWg36EwNT8Li1Tp1TbzGjjWpqLuHU3yMzo1eLtBxqSDhP+GTsqXV 1ffAckqXEPX1zQhbObCWr+aS4unhJCMaTXoXu5+9WvCqPgtifVhq+TM4zqRBJr8QOlHtcHFnAkrt1 8I402j37ZSydEQ==; In-Reply-To: <87h6k6chhq.fsf@gmail.com> (message from =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec on Mon, 25 Dec 2023 18:35:45 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314215 Archived-At: > From: Kévin Le Gouguec > Cc: Karl Fogel , stefankangas@gmail.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 18:35:45 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Karl Fogel > >> Cc: Stefan Kangas , emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 10:34:32 -0500 > >> > >> "The inspection" can be an arbitrarily complex process, during > >> which the user should have all the usual power of Emacs available. > > > > You always have the possibility of aborting the connection with C-g > > and then doing all those arbitrarily complex processes. > > But C-g dismisses the *Certificate Details* buffer, so that makes an > "arbitrarily complex" inspection somewhat hard to proceed with? Who said that those complex processes need those details? No specifics were brought up about those complex processes, so we are all basically waving hands, and each one of us has some different mental picture about what's involved. This doesn't tend to lead towards effective discussion with any useful outcome. > All I can say is that the first time I met this prompt, my reflexes were > > * C-x o - "Ah, right; rmc, can't do that" > * C-g; C-x b Cert TAB - "Oh, drats; the buffer was killed" I guess you haven't read the prompt, because my reflex was to type 'd' and read there. > So FWIW (a) would have had my vote, and FWIW² I'd have been fine with it > being optional & off by default. But now that I know about rmc > leveraging query-replace-map and the C-r escape hatch, no strong > opinion. Thanks for sharing, so I guess your personal conclusion is that nothing needs to be done, yes?