From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "resource temporarily unavailable" errors on windows 7 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:47:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83ehsvvzvv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <CAH-ciFoNr0U7FfJ488MCLSS+zCc6WFF1YrZsQaXXfbL0V8docw@mail.gmail.com> <83aa3lybos.fsf@gnu.org> <CAH-ciFpTUaMyqZgy-OBrM0S=DKq=KVRsg8Y74DYuEgvOyDk-=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAH-ciFryjk30BsozbaNx8n19aa5LaJFG_=EU1x+osoX3v=Kmsg@mail.gmail.com> <83vcm9w3th.fsf@gnu.org> <CAH-ciFq+srBc2=g3kmy9gfJGPcBfS=VajPnjcMB4pn1G-cwqNg@mail.gmail.com> <83obs0wb0p.fsf@gnu.org> <CAH-ciFpFFt4FQXOGD8hLkKC6ws80dKz6NE8Pn6+VWkyjCZBS2g@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331747311 13248 80.91.229.3 (14 Mar 2012 17:48:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alex Harsanyi <alexharsanyi@gmail.com> Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 14 18:48:30 2012 Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>) id 1S7sJF-0007gQ-MW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:48:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35797 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>) id 1S7sJF-0001T7-5H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:48:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1S7sIr-00015m-0Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:48:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1S7sIk-0001DL-Bu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:48:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:51996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1S7sIk-0001D1-3A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:47:54 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M0V00H00YK77W00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:47:00 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.179.236]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M0V00GN3YQBCQP0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:47:00 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <CAH-ciFpFFt4FQXOGD8hLkKC6ws80dKz6NE8Pn6+VWkyjCZBS2g@mail.gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149056 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/149056> > Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:27:31 +0800 > From: Alex Harsanyi <alexharsanyi@gmail.com> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Question: does the problem happen right when you invoke the first > > subprocess, or only after several subprocesses are already running, > > and you try to invoke another one? > > It does not happen all the time, I'd say about 1 out of 4 tries for a > `M-x diff-backup RET' call. In terms of running processes, > (process-list) returns: > > (#<process ielm> #<process cleartool> #<process edit-server> > #<process server>) > > BTW, it also happens when I run "emacs -Q", but less often, although > when I tested the CreateThread failure, I run emacs -Q under gdb and > it failed on the third try. "On the third try" meaning that you have 2 other subprocesses running, or did you invoke a process, then terminated it, then invoked another, etc. 3 times? > I also noticed that spontaneously, the Stack reserved size grows by > about 10-12Mb (Free section decreases accordingly), than the memory is > released a few seconds later. Is that for the Emacs process? If so, I would suspect that GC kicked in. You can see if that's so by setting garbage-collection-messages non-nil. Did you try increasing the size of the original request in allocate_heap, and if you did, what was the maximum value that still gives you a good Emacs session? Thanks for working on this.