From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing? Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:43:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83ehkv0xnp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <507B404C.8050602@cornell.edu> <507B4A96.6000804@dancol.org> <507B6404.8080103@cornell.edu> <507B68BD.2050409@dancol.org> <83pq4j4pwi.fsf@gnu.org> <507C64EF.5040209@cornell.edu> <507C659A.2020409@dancol.org> <507C8096.2090003@dancol.org> <507C8180.8010601@cornell.edu> <507C81EA.1000502@dancol.org> <507D5FD0.4060403@cornell.edu> <83zk3m2s31.fsf@gnu.org> <507FF5DE.1060307@cornell.edu> <83txtr1zcx.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350629039 12324 80.91.229.3 (19 Oct 2012 06:43:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 06:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dancol@dancol.org, kbrown@cornell.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 19 08:44:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TP6JM-0004aF-Rb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:44:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36944 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TP6JF-000833-Od for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:43:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TP6JD-00082u-6O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TP6JC-0004kf-2C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:38520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TP6JB-0004kY-Qe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:43:49 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MC400I00NY4EI00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:43:48 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MC400IXWO107AB0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:43:48 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154435 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Ken Brown , dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:04:38 -0400 > > > This just means NSTATIC should be bumped up again (which Daniel > > already did, I see). > > > I think going from 0x650 to 0x1000 is too much. But I'll let Stefan > > decide. > > I'm not too worried about those 20KB, but yes, 0x800 sounds like > a better choice. Done.