From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:42:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83ehiyarzm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> <83pq2ib53h.fsf@gnu.org> <87fw3egpla.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355150566 27876 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2012 14:42:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, dmoncayo@gmail.com To: Romain Francoise Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 10 15:43:00 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4ZP-0000UP-Jm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:42:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55274 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4ZD-0005nQ-3F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:42:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4Z6-0005nA-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:42:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4Z1-0005YD-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:42:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:35237) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4Z1-0005Y7-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:42:35 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MET00700KTCT500@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:42:31 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MET007J9KUUMT30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:42:30 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87fw3egpla.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155429 Archived-At: > From: Romain Francoise > Cc: Stefan Monnier , dmoncayo@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:37:37 +0100 > > FWIW, on my Core i7-2600 (4 cores, 8 threads), `make -j16 bootstrap' > runs in about 1m30s: > > 403.12s user 20.83s system 463% cpu 1:31.37 total What about "make -j2"? That was the basis for comparison, so going to higher parallelization gets in the way of comparison.