From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dumper issue, revisited; invalid realloc/free Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 22:40:15 +0200 Message-ID: <83egq5fm1c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150204175709.GX23507@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <83oap9fppc.fsf@gnu.org> <20150204193732.GZ23507@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <83k2zxfomm.fsf@gnu.org> <20150204200842.GC23507@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423082483 24170 80.91.229.3 (4 Feb 2015 20:41:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Rich Felker Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 04 21:41:22 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ6lG-0002J8-4d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:41:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38724 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ6lF-0004Q5-LJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:41:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ6kO-0003Zb-Sw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:40:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ6kL-0004PZ-Fx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:40:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:64398) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ6kL-0004PL-8a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:40:25 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NJ900L00L6FIR00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 22:40:22 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NJ900L7ELFAGV40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 22:40:22 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <20150204200842.GC23507@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182403 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:08:42 -0500 > From: Rich Felker > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Upon checking master, w32heap.c is not using the system malloc. It's > its own implementation of the malloc API written on top of the Win32 > HeapAlloc API. System malloc on Windows is a thin wrapper around HeapAlloc, so we are actually using system malloc. There are good reasons why we call HeapAlloc directly, but they are immaterial for the purposes of this discussion.