From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concurrency, again Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:18:08 +0300 Message-ID: <83eg3exjrz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <86k2dk77w6.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <9D64B8EA-DB52-413D-AE6A-264416C391F3@iotcl.com> <83int1g0s5.fsf@gnu.org> <83twckekqq.fsf@gnu.org> <874m4aic0g.fsf@tromey.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476771535 6300 195.159.176.226 (18 Oct 2016 06:18:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 06:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tom Tromey Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 18 08:18:51 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bwNjQ-0007Vg-1e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:18:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39137 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwNjS-0007br-7K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:18:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwNjJ-0007be-6p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:18:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwNjG-0004Do-20 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:18:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwNjF-0004Dk-Uq; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:18:25 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2765 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bwNjE-0000nl-Uj; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 02:18:25 -0400 In-reply-to: <874m4aic0g.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:14:55 -0600) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208389 Archived-At: > From: Tom Tromey > Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:14:55 -0600 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >>>>> "John" == John Wiegley writes: > > John> Tom, if I can find some volunteers to help, would you be willing > John> to see the work of merging this into master through to completion? > > I can help to some degree, but I definitely can't do it all myself. Thanks in advance. > There are two main issues. > > First, it has to be rebased. There have been a lot of changes since it > was written -- I tried a rebase last year but it was pretty painful, I > think I stopped while fixing up the process changes. Was it before or after Ken Raeburn did his rebase? > Second, last time this was discussed there were a reasonably large > number of comments on features that had to be done in order to merge. Can you point to this discussion? > BTW Ken Raeburn was also interested in this branch. Yes, indeed.