From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 17:31:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83eg2mgf8l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6e2cffe5-942b-48d4-9ed5-ef39803bcd30@googlegroups.com> <87mvhgsf21.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8360o4monq.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaw4gq0j.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83oa1vlnkk.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1iba6od.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83ins2jq88.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg2p8swx.fsf@russet.org.uk> <831sypjmst.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpggip8j.fsf@gnu.org> <05ba947a-970a-178c-8036-bcdf84485384@cs.ucla.edu> <87inrzz4y0.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87fun2vxab.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478619186 11382 195.159.176.226 (8 Nov 2016 15:33:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 08 16:33:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c48O0-0007WR-IN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 16:32:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33838 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c48O3-0003Ud-LW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:32:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c48NN-0003UK-Pu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:31:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c48NJ-0004yA-KP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:31:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57903) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c48NJ-0004y4-HI; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:31:49 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2914 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c48NC-0008If-3N; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:31:42 -0500 In-reply-to: <87fun2vxab.fsf@russet.org.uk> (phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209289 Archived-At: > From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) > Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 14:52:44 +0000 > > Can I suggest we add 9x, and Windows XP into the list for Emacs-26? My main development machine runs Windows XP, so if you want to drop support for it, you should ask me to resign first. Btw, there are 2 versions of Windows between 9X and XP, which we still support, and you didn't mention.