From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tabulated list recenter issue Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:44:42 +0300 Message-ID: <83efwxkd6t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h93dogki.fsf@escafil> <87mvbm30lc.fsf@escafil> <83o9w2jh6m.fsf@gnu.org> <75f53b81-cee5-db91-3eee-3819b120ad28@gmail.com> <83lgr6jdui.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492001104 1823 195.159.176.226 (12 Apr 2017 12:45:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dunni@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?windows-1252?Q?Cl=E9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 14:44:59 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cyHdr-0000Kx-6z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:44:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44145 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyHdx-0003sI-4s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:45:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyHdJ-0003s2-9s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:44:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyHdI-0005jy-Jc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:44:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43664) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyHdI-0005ju-G1; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:44:24 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3689 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cyHdH-0005CV-Ka; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:44:24 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from =?windows-1252?Q?Cl=E9ment?= Pit-Claudel on Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:28:40 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213909 Archived-At: > Cc: dunni@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Clément Pit-Claudel > Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:28:40 -0400 > > > IOW, I personally like the current behavior a lot. Of course, all of > > my use cases are with lists longer than a single window. > > Wait, but in the very large majority of these cases the patch won't change anything, will it? The only case in which it changes things is when sorting puts your current entry towards the bottom of the list. Yes. But I also like it when I'm in the last window-full of text.