From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal: move write-contents-functions higher up in basic-save-buffer Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 20:46:44 +0300 Message-ID: <83efvem9kr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zie4yr9s.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83y3tnmn88.fsf@gnu.org> <87wp97xjak.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83h90bm11c.fsf@gnu.org> <87poeyyht2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495648021 18967 195.159.176.226 (24 May 2017 17:47:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 24 19:46:57 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDaN6-0004qm-Ib for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 19:46:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56140 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDaNC-0006pc-8l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 13:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDaN6-0006oF-80 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 13:46:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDaN1-0007WB-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 13:46:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54613) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDaN1-0007W6-9v; Wed, 24 May 2017 13:46:51 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2068 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dDaN0-0005EB-O6; Wed, 24 May 2017 13:46:51 -0400 In-reply-to: <87poeyyht2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (message from Eric Abrahamsen on Wed, 24 May 2017 12:55:53 +0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215175 Archived-At: > From: Eric Abrahamsen > Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 12:55:53 +0800 > > > My thinking was that by somehow overcoming this obstacle, you can > > allow users to easily use write-contents-functions as they need. > > > > Does this make sense? If not, can you tell what is the difficulty in > > this regard? > > I probably just did a poor job writing the initial message. That's what > I was proposing to begin with: to jiggle `basic-save-buffer' (and I > think also `save-some-buffers') so that the running of > `write-contents-functions' comes earlier in the function, or is > otherwise in its own branch that doesn't require a `buffer-file-name'. Then I guess we are in violent agreement. > I can try to produce a patch, if this is acceptable in principle. Yes, please. Thanks.