From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: windows installer Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 05:43:35 +0200 Message-ID: <83efopbqxk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <795606216.288650.1510476987589@mail.libero.it> <83po8nn38p.fsf@gnu.org> <8760adbxw6.fsf@russet.org.uk> <1369184752.491791.1510670215753@mail.libero.it> <1447748875.458066.1510690344828@mail.libero.it> <1511167607.4167724.1178177216.0DCA23E2@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87k1yh535q.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1511408669 19606 195.159.176.226 (23 Nov 2017 03:44:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 03:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jostein@kjonigsen.net, jostein@secure.kjonigsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 23 04:44:23 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHiQx-0004BH-0Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 04:44:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42377 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHiR4-0008R9-5q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 22:44:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42939) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHiQO-0008R4-G6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 22:43:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHiQK-0005Sy-8b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 22:43:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHiQK-0005Su-50; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 22:43:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1517 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eHiQJ-0005ra-Ia; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 22:43:36 -0500 In-reply-to: <87k1yh535q.fsf@russet.org.uk> (phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220383 Archived-At: > From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) > Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 23:01:21 +0000 > Cc: jostein@kjonigsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Does Emacs still store the build machine anywhere in the binaries that > it produces? See emacs-build-system. > Currently, the windows build machine is on my own private network, > but if I shift it to the cloud, it's going to be with public IP; it > makes no sense to advertise this. If you remove that, how will we know from the bug report that the binary they used is the one we distribute from the GNU site? It's an important piece of information when looking into a bug.