From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: while-no-input and pending input (was: while-no-input interrupted by *shell*) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:18:16 +0300 Message-ID: <83efdg8hqv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sh1y535s.fsf@web.de> <87k1n94gg2.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1537971386 3448 195.159.176.226 (26 Sep 2018 14:16:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 26 16:16:22 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g5Ac2-0000nA-3a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:16:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59108 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g5Ae8-0000TH-Ec for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:18:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g5Adx-0000SW-Uk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:18:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g5Adu-0003Fz-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:18:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g5Adu-0003FN-L2; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:18:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4120 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1g5Adu-00066X-64; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:18:18 -0400 In-reply-to: <87k1n94gg2.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:47:41 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230084 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:47:41 +0200 > > What could I else do in this situation to prevent the frame switch or > whatever event to be misinterpreted as user input? Could/should w-n-i > generally ignore events in `while-no-input-ignore-events' - I mean, also > the input-pending-p part? I don't see how this could be done: AFAIK, these events are not visible in Lisp, at least some of them. Why cannot you drain the event queue before calling while-no-input?