From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bloat in the Emacs Windows package Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 21:42:19 +0300 Message-ID: <83ef5fmlbo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mukocyze.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83v9zceb3n.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvev1epx.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83v9zbcesn.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7gnypsx.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83sguecxth.fsf@gnu.org> <87r29t22pk.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87ef5t9h18.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87ftq47mq6.fsf@russet.org.uk> <877ebf8g8v.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83k1f8nibt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="262501"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Lindqvist Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 03 23:15:07 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfWG-0012u5-Rn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 23:15:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45912 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMd8w-00076h-IF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:42:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMd8m-00075A-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:42:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMd8m-0002HX-99; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:42:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3600 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hMd8l-0003D8-RP; Fri, 03 May 2019 14:42:36 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Lindqvist on Fri, 3 May 2019 20:38:09 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236111 Archived-At: > From: Björn Lindqvist > Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 20:38:09 +0200 > Cc: Phillip Lord , Stefan Monnier , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Wouldn't it be more efficient if each user had their own .pdmp file? > For example, I never use gnus but I use markdown-mode and erc > all the time so, for me, it would be better if the latter two packages were > part of the dump image but not the former. The plan is to allow that, yes. We are not there yet: currently, re-dumping causes some incorrect behavior. But regardless of that, the standard pdump file, the one which is produced when Emacs is built from sources, should always be there, so not having it is unusual.