From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-27 60c84ad: ; * etc/TODO: Fix last change. Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 19:05:51 +0200 Message-ID: <83eeu5behc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200229173124.11831.98476@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83d09txw29.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfogw1gn.fsf@gnu.org> <83eeu8vy0e.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9njutez.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv33uop0.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8tbunzh.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfoevod9.fsf@gnu.org> <83k13yvn8u.fsf@gnu.org> <83blpavd0l.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="120711"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 06 18:07:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jAGRN-000VK2-A3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 18:07:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39514 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jAGRM-0001Rk-AT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:07:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jAGQ8-0000LR-CP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:05:57 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jAGQ7-0000Qt-0K; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:05:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4793 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jAGQ6-0000mG-Kv; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:05:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Robert Pluim on Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:32:40 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245289 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu , > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:32:40 +0100 > > >>>>> On Thu, 05 Mar 2020 21:04:58 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: > > >> If you look at the list of Emoji codepoints I sent earlier, I think > >> you'll agree that they're all over the place. But at least this makes > >> the patch smaller :-) > > Eli> Yes. And I think the Emoji that are outside of those 4 blocks are of > Eli> the kind that by default display in their text presentation, isn't > Eli> that right? > > A lot of them, yes, but not all. E.g. U+231A has Emoji == yes, and > Emoji_Presentation == yes. We can always augment by hand what charscript.el does, for select codepoints, if we want.