From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dash.el [was: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs] Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 17:42:44 +0300 Message-ID: <83eerh9ue3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <35DBF02E-44D7-41E5-A217-7D6EC84ED221@icloud.com> <4e937898-ae46-710a-cbca-e452a1156fa1@yandex.ru> <405FCFAB-30E4-4F98-81DA-3B09933E86D0@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="43080"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 18 16:43:29 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jagzI-000B6X-LO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 16:43:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50188 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jagzH-0006Bk-Or for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 10:43:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jagym-0005jA-Ii for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 10:42:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58398) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jagym-0005ou-9z for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2020 10:42:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4898 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jagye-0002B3-S9; Mon, 18 May 2020 10:42:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Sun, 17 May 2020 23:49:39 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250753 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > cc: Emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 23:49:39 -0400 > > The reliable way to do that is to have two archives: one we say you > can trust, and one that provides only a place to distribute them. > > Good names might be "GNU Emacs Exocore" for the ones we review, and > "GNU ELPA" for those we don't. I suggest "Exocore" as meaning "like > the core, but hosted separately." > > Or maybe, GNU ELPA for the ones we review, and Alt-ELPA for what we don't. > > For now, let's call them reviewed and unreviewed. > > > MAYBE it will work well if we get papers for the reviewed packages > but not for the unreviewed. Then the reviewed packages might be > merged into the core, and the unreviewed are ones we don't consider > moving into the core. So if we think a package might be good to put > in the core, we should review it AND get papers for it. > > Eli, do you think that makes sense? I do, and a similar suggestion was mentioned here more than once in the recent days (including by myself). The question is, do we have a wide enough consensus about such an arrangement?