From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: empty-directory predicate, native implementation Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:12:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83eem0zt0b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y2ka18t7.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2kaj799.fsf@gmx.de> <83blh60wgr.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7qxjh7g.fsf@gmx.de> <878sc8kgy8.fsf@gmx.de> <87imbcls71.fsf@gmx.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32891"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: arthur.miller@live.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 14 18:19:40 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSjV5-0008Qv-Px for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:19:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54098 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSjV3-0005T4-BA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:19:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33026) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSjNr-0003JM-KE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:12:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSjNr-0002WI-6B; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:12:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1090 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kSjNq-0005MZ-Cu; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:12:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87imbcls71.fsf@gmx.de> (message from Michael Albinus on Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:53:38 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257653 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:53:38 +0200 > > > It was just to test if empty; but now empty is better served with asking > > just for one file and testing for null; and I was also thinking what to > > do with 0 count if asked for after I sent patch yesterday; it seemed > > like a bit more useful then just return nil early. > > > > I can send tomorrow one that just returns nil and exits. > > Let's wait what Eli prefers. I think 0 doesn't make much sense, so we might as well not support that at all.