From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ai_flags in calls to getaddrinfo, broader call for reproducibility check Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:25:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83eeirfqbo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sg7mggls.fsf@gnu.org> <83czymc8nq.fsf@gnu.org> <74b7a0a9-0eb3-7944-19d2-f72424ee72d7@dasyatidae.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32352"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robin Tarsiger Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 11 16:26:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyz5f-0008J9-Ik for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:26:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42680 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyz5e-0000S8-Ij for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:26:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyz4l-0008PP-6q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:25:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38409) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyz4k-000538-Fh; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:25:46 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2208 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kyz4Z-000473-Ck; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:25:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <74b7a0a9-0eb3-7944-19d2-f72424ee72d7@dasyatidae.com> (message from Robin Tarsiger on Mon, 11 Jan 2021 04:47:11 -0600) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262914 Archived-At: > From: Robin Tarsiger > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 04:47:11 -0600 > > > Note the difference in he.net resolution with and without the 'ipv6 > > argument, and also the behavior of ipv6.google.com with the ipv6 > > argument. Interesting, no? > > Definitely. The behavior of "he.net" with 'ipv6 in the former group > is something I think of as to be avoided, per elsethread, but this > shows the latter truncation for nil more concretely, of course... > and the error-swapping behavior with "ipv6.google.com" is bizarre > and hard to reconcile with earlier observations, especially the > nil-family case. I wonder whether that changes with 'ipv4? No, it behaves as expected. > Your ipconfig result showed no "real" IPv6 connectivity How did you see this? Would it be possible to deduce that from the output of, say, network-interface-list? I'm asking because I'm still bothered by failures in those two tests, and would like to avoid that. I think it's bad if a test fails when there's nothing wrong with Emacs; we should try to skip such tests when we know their results cannot be trusted. Thanks.