From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 15:11:38 +0300
Message-ID: <83ee8rrcat.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83zgriwnv2.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnmmwnn3.fsf@gnu.org>
 <8735p9jo51.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83bl3xrwl0.fsf@gnu.org>
 <871r4sby3h.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83r1csrbxn.fsf@gnu.org>
 <83k0ikqp1x.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfx83ydy.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="7353"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E9vin?= Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 11 14:13:02 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mZuAu-0001da-Vg
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:13:00 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44774 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mZuAt-0001oS-S4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:12:59 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39778)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mZu9n-0000L1-UC
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:11:52 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51514)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mZu9l-0008MT-GP; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:11:49 -0400
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2351 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mZu9l-0000uk-2Y; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:11:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87sfx83ydy.fsf@gmail.com> (message from =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E9v?=
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?in?= Le Gouguec on Mon, 11 Oct 2021 07:48:25 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276736
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/276736>

> From: Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com>
> Cc: juri@linkov.net,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 07:48:25 +0200
> 
> > How about "C-x 4 x" and "C-x 5 x". where "x" stands for "eXecute"?
> > An alternative could be "C-x 4 RET" and "C-x 5 RET".
> >
> > Would any of these be acceptable?
> 
> I don't mind x or RET in terms of mnemonics, but my clumsy fingers find
> them less ergonomic than C-x K K.

That's a peculiar argument.  There's only one "C-x K K" combination
for any K, and yet we have more than a dozen commands starting with
"C-x 4" and similarly for "C-x 5".  Does it mean that all but one of
them is not ergonomic?