From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master e714b31 3/6: Merge from origin/emacs-28 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 20:47:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83ee7n3l0m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20211106092430.31690.17236@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20211106092433.20A2420A22@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87zgqcgg3n.fsf@gmail.com> <83k0hg2avf.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17937"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 10 19:50:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mksg1-0004Qp-Ip for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 19:50:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52326 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mksg0-0000jr-Gk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:50:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mksda-00072L-I3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:47:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=46662 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mksda-0000MJ-8Z; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:47:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=p1zYQZA7HZ9yynUNIMSb265Ey5GD4dDz8CnL0Us46mc=; b=kmWAweEZEI0Q Tq6hakE1hbUK6q0XuuV7jAheXrludBV1yfZFZi1X9cFFXhnjbe4qP9Lx0EQW9l7KPax8YlcTREXp5 APGZ5kROzbabnjrK5RSF5DSaN3Hlcf/oHPRhdixHeTK0HgI5WEhd4/6C0OTiGCQshwbxxVmN4nS/h 87A1AkUPdNcHQFPLBs1Wz48/HnCSrakJC/9zH+/dnTolH0rYucCg75NhHCnxGYYjV/9lRzNJd5/Xe 1zrLGpG4Z9El1qZObS4EYXxML3Zkl5fYkFJSusbSWqagt88ADgPCpi4p7yhTUG46s58M01Ske3/44 zNDUYvdhL0BSYDKGRcbLTA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2909 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mksdZ-000328-Or; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:47:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:49:42 -0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279191 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:49:42 -0800 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > There was sufficient resistance to using a versioned name, > > What resistance? I see only overwhelming support based on this thread > and e.g. these: > > https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2017-12/msg00340.html > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=29366 I guess we read different discussions, then. > > so we should stick to what we have as long as it works well enough. > > I think we have proof that it doesn't. How can a simple bug in gitmerge be a proof of anything (except that bugs happen)?