From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Android port Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 09:27:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83edkjwcdg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pm43a1jp.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87pm43a1jp.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40235"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 04 08:28:28 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qRoIR-000A67-9O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2023 08:28:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qRoHZ-0002Q3-IJ; Fri, 04 Aug 2023 02:27:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qRoHX-0002Pa-Sr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2023 02:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qRoHX-0007XH-KN; Fri, 04 Aug 2023 02:27:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=4C2hYvUnxZ9VuDwJhQBAyjO5PrpedoYBRcFitPjMpgQ=; b=f16vhlxmXI9pBiCiE9HN s4u04WpX076zePnhuCn742yWVhR1D8it+SvhkCeXXf18GYh151A/ppf6nhBLjZG8jUPjnjYFtLRIN agSRkYOVtKM4Vpmwve/tayQdfvKEs9KgBi1CNa4y6wFaxUofbArnJOb5n20jTfeqpbVDpstqYmiQx 7Qaa69dbRwyzIt63dlV3WMNwG/fpHihMuVbrbPx92S1rfmttWRHskE8C6QELvNAriv/6FNpaGc+tK 6vT3KIzfNzHpORrcMHisRYyMN0pLdHQJXngC8ZpSfklodIoyuciTpPLJjeN14JjXTRhalcw0nNQEb kYNtBrLybscf8A==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qRoHX-0000bo-2e; Fri, 04 Aug 2023 02:27:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pm43a1jp.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Fri, 04 Aug 2023 12:12:26 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308269 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 12:12:26 +0800 > > No consensus was built the previous time we debated whether to include > this code or not, but with Emacs 29.1 out the door and master relatively > calm, I would like to revisit this subject. There's no need to revisit, from where I stand. It is quite clear this community as a whole thinks that having the port as part of Emacs is more important than the potential difficulties and issues it could create. > Also, would someone ascertain if the branch still builds on MS Windows, > after the past few updates from Gnulib? Once Someone™ confirms that the MinGW and NS builds work on that branch, you can go ahead and land the branch on master. (But please be sure to make a proper log message naming all the new files and changes in existing ones, when you merge.) And a huge thanks for working on this port.