From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned? Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 14:22:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83edesqajp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5phiap4.fsf@posteo.net> <83plydqi63.fsf@gnu.org> <83o7dxqe03.fsf@gnu.org> <0bce788f-5659-4f31-9793-4bbf0137bf5e@gutov.dev> <83frz8qywh.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5728"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org To: dmitry@gutov.dev Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 08 13:24:00 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rMoff-0001CC-Vl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 13:24:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMoet-0003EJ-UK; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 07:23:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMoes-0003CE-2I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 07:23:10 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMoep-0006QE-D3; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 07:23:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=lRc0j0Gl5iAJG83WhViA5VQLV5gvSE7y3u64zlqgJOE=; b=ZIknWK/nzYau qy6iu4sfgbhTdkoasXE90p2MAflI6XcdncgqUXvgEl0vxkJKHUyAoHx/L7X0Pu7Gk8/opmOiwNIIz dbclJucsTyemlVq6F/HQiKah4Y+E57Qv7yzhDUQTN2k8nwq6p3tpaMre9qx+BjqXi9DwEn6eOchHy TTi5x1ObgKMYNyuW7xux4SATV6AC5zbhbbMFVSsbHZTM7DWCBZv0HINEdVhVALZrVX/wKe7TZIR3/ KWW3zJTLj30+BT3aagAdYis+UJWUw+ESGa6RWn/nmzNTa5vt8WH+fPgG/Xqp0rETDRR7tykTXdpM8 xQI7Uusn6kR6gdhsqPjtJQ==; In-Reply-To: <83frz8qywh.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 08 Jan 2024 05:36:46 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314743 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 05:36:46 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org > > > >> Perhaps it doesn't make a difference to you, but I routinely have to page through notifications for > > >> commits and bug reports to features that I have no interest in (nor ability to meaningfully contribute). > > >> Such as ERC, for example. > > > > > > Email filtering could help with that, perhaps? > > > > Probably not: the commit messages are not always used consistently, and > > if one filters out messages by body contents, it risks false positives, > > e.g. in cases where a commit touches many packages as once. > > OK, but at least IME there's no problem at all to deal with the email > flow due to additions of packages. And in addition, bug reports about ELPA packages are also sent to debbugs, so the traffic is basically unaffected by whether a package is in core or on ELPA.