From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r113909: Refine the documentation of `insert-buffer-substring'. Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 21:43:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83d2pdmq84.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838v02nona.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376678840 32275 80.91.229.3 (16 Aug 2013 18:47:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 18:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xfq.free@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 16 20:47:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VAP3P-0000N3-PI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:47:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60991 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAP3P-0000l8-BV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:47:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAOyw-00048P-W1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:42:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAOyr-0003TN-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:42:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:59578) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAOyr-0003T7-Kp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:42:37 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MRM00700ZHOKP00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 21:42:36 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MRM007QAZYXJD50@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 21:42:36 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162825 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: xfq.free@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:20:02 -0400 > > If we want to be more explicit, then rather than using "inclusive" and > "exclusive", I'd rather we add a blurb like "Remember that positions are > /between/ characters, so the char right \"at\" END will not be included". What's the difference? Both say that character at END will be excluded.