From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making --with-wide-int the default Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:06:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83d1wf6v47.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r3trulse.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0D7E0.305@87.69.4.28> <83h9unukbg.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0DEF8.7020901@dancol> <83egpruiyp.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0FF93.2000104@dancol.org> <5610ED13.1010406@dancol.org> <56117F37.9060808@dancol.org> <83oag087gs.fsf@gnu.org> <83oafz70im.fsf@gnu.org> <5620AF43.4050401@cs.ucla.edu> <8737xbusz1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444988154 10904 80.91.229.3 (16 Oct 2015 09:35:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 16 11:35:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn1QK-0004u5-B0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:35:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52198 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn1QJ-0004cP-N1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:35:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56239) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn0xi-00025U-Fp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn0xh-00062G-RE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:42035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn0xc-0005zd-Kp; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:06:00 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NWB002002I8FF00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:05:59 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NWB001HB2LYYS90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:05:59 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <8737xbusz1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191732 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Juanma Barranquero , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:18:26 +0200 > > Instead of going to 64-bit unilaterally it would seem to make more sense > to me to degrade gracefully into gmp. How can GMP help extend the maximum size of buffers and strings beyond what a 32-bit EMACS_INT allows? And how can GMP be faster than (or even close to) the native 64-bit integral types supported by the C compiler?