From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH PING] Honor 'SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH' when generating autoloads. Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:10:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83d1txozu9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k2ph3mgx.fsf@gnu.org> <87io4lnkyz.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvtwoktg.fsf@gnu.org> <878u5gkakj.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8pwoesc.fsf@gnu.org> <87two3475d.fsf@gnu.org> <5665D6B9.4030309@cs.ucla.edu> <5665DAA1.2080208@cs.ucla.edu> <83k2o9t6t1.fsf@gnu.org> <56771D52.2070406@cs.ucla.edu> <83fuytp1au.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450890621 22254 80.91.229.3 (23 Dec 2015 17:10:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 23 18:10:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aBmvU-00087j-RE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 18:10:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57071 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBmvT-0004ct-Qt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:10:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60393) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBmvP-0004Zv-RC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:10:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBmvK-0006dh-12 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:10:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBmvJ-0006dd-VJ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:10:01 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2283 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aBmvJ-0003kD-5W; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:10:01 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Philipp Stephani on Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:52:08 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196721 Archived-At: > From: Philipp Stephani > Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:52:08 +0000 > Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I'd prefer calling this "deterministic-build", so that we could use it > to solve any other similar problems unrelated to dumping. Maybe even > "reproducible-build". > > I think we have two categories of builds here: > - Builds that get executed when running 'make' in the Emacs directory. This > includes dumping and byte compilation of code bundled with Emacs. > - Builds that get executed by running an initialized Emacs binary, likely on a > different machine. This includes e.g. byte compilation of third-party > libraries. > I think these two categories are separate enough to have two different > variables. Why not use the same variable/option for both? It sounds simpler to me.