From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Code reviews Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:09:15 +0200 Message-ID: <83d1r5rlxw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56BE7E37.3090708@cs.ucla.edu> <4hd1rw1ubr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83vb50wxhv.fsf@gnu.org> <87y49vz4cg.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <87vb4zb0i4.fsf@gnu.org> <837fheuu6a.fsf@gnu.org> <877fheb1rh.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87ziua9mwq.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83h9git36k.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb4y9ep9.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83a8mat2aa.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3fm9du0.fsf@wanadoo.es> <878u1tuzgn.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457453389 28628 80.91.229.3 (8 Mar 2016 16:09:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 08 17:09:44 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1adKCd-0000Sz-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 17:09:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35551 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adKCc-0008FU-6c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:09:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38243) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adKC8-0007sw-8o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:09:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adKC2-0001k8-Im for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:09:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adKC2-0001k1-FG; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:09:06 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2714 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1adKC1-0002BL-SN; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:09:06 -0500 In-reply-to: <878u1tuzgn.fsf@russet.org.uk> (phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201160 Archived-At: > From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) > Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 08:48:56 +0000 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Giving people different permissions on different branches seems to make > sense. Overtime, people move toward master/emacs-25. AFAIK, Git (or is it Savannah?) doesn't support such granularity. > > Maybe we could have a half-way system, where commits are pushed to > > a branch that is "not fast-forward-only", and this branch is then > > auto-merged to the real (fast-forward-only) master branch after a delay > > (one day, maybe?) to give time to fix mess ups before they're cast > > in stone. > > I think that this would require some considerable co-ordination. If I > push a broken commit to devel branch, and then you fix this commit > through rebase, my copy of the branch (and everyone elses) is now > broken. Stefan was talking about merging, not rebasing.