From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `thunk-let'? Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 22:26:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83d14rqjv8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87infp9z6j.fsf@web.de> <87zi90eehg.fsf@web.de> <87o9ocd6s4.fsf@web.de> <83zi7wr6jc.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1z0csxa.fsf_-_@web.de> <83k1yzqshk.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2t7wc9d.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510259225 7897 195.159.176.226 (9 Nov 2017 20:27:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 20:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 09 21:26:55 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCtPa-0001bv-R8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 21:26:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38649 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCtPi-0000Mc-7K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35421) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCtP9-0000ML-Nc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:26:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCtP6-0008Iv-Lb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:26:27 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCtP6-0008Ik-IU; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:26:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3187 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eCtP5-0005d3-V2; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:26:24 -0500 In-reply-to: <87r2t7wc9d.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:14:06 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220006 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:14:06 +0100 > > > I'm not sure this should be in subr-x.el. That file is AFAIU for > > stuff used _internally_ in Emacs, which this macro isn't. > > It's a very basic binding construct. Albeit the internals are a bit > more complicated, I think it is in the same class of macros as `when', > for example. In which way is `lazy-let' less "internal" than `when'? > > I'm not sure I fully get what "internal" means in this context... It means not intended for use outside of Emacs internals.