From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Split `simple.el'? Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 09:33:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83d0ze2mct.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5f1e960c-483f-4902-b4c2-b7a4ca3b04f4@default> <09f28766-b715-30b5-3e00-5365b5959e77@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522909914 2175 195.159.176.226 (5 Apr 2018 06:31:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 06:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 05 08:31:49 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f3yR1-0000Pj-IY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 08:31:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34211 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3yT7-000088-12 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 02:33:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54988) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3ySx-00005M-DC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 02:33:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3ySs-0006BS-Ek for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 02:33:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3ySs-0006BG-Ay; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 02:33:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2149 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f3ySr-0005v0-Lz; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 02:33:42 -0400 In-reply-to: <09f28766-b715-30b5-3e00-5365b5959e77@gmail.com> (message from =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel on Wed, 4 Apr 2018 22:37:25 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224356 Archived-At: > From: Clément Pit-Claudel > Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 22:37:25 -0400 > > That buffer is very strange. Selecting parts of it causes the fonts to change in all sorts of surprising ways. Anything like that is generally a bug: it means we don't supply enough of the buffer to the shaping engine for it to return the correct glyphs, which means some problem in the composition rules and/or in the shaping engine itself (which in your case is libotf/libm17n-flt).