From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bignum branch Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 14:29:01 +0300 Message-ID: <83d0uytloi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o9fbbw1t.fsf@tromey.com> <86in5jdj49.fsf@gmail.com> <83wotxaiwi.fsf@gnu.org> <86k1pxmvmx.fsf@gmail.com> <87efg4a9xc.fsf@tromey.com> <87a7qr8cz7.fsf@tromey.com> <86tvoy3je9.fsf@gmail.com> <86bmb0vbxf.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1pnfcg1.fsf@tromey.com> <86sh4b1833.fsf@gmail.com> <861sbgz3dm.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7q4ufxp.fsf@gnu.org> <86in4resc8.fsf@gmail.com> <831sbfvl11.fsf@gnu.org> <8636vv7ohh.fsf@gmail.com> <83y3dntwsw.fsf@gnu.org> <83wot7tkdh.fsf@gnu.org> <86efffgr9h.fsf@gmail.com> <83o9eiu0d6.fsf@gnu.org> <86600qgz9h.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533382035 18360 195.159.176.226 (4 Aug 2018 11:27:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 11:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 04 13:27:11 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fluiF-0004gG-0T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 13:27:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54683 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flukL-0000DY-M5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 07:29:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flukF-0000DO-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 07:29:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flukA-0002xl-7q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 07:29:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flukA-0002xa-42; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 07:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2028 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fluk9-0005b5-I4; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 07:29:09 -0400 In-reply-to: <86600qgz9h.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Andy Moreton on Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:14:02 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228153 Archived-At: > From: Andy Moreton > Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:14:02 +0100 > > On Sat 04 Aug 2018, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> From: Andy Moreton > >> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 20:54:34 +0100 > >> > >> If I apply the following from master to the bignum branch then a 32bit > >> MinGW build succeeds: > >> > >> 024d20f81e ("Fix compilation with mingw.org's MinGW 5.x headers") > >> bd52f37cae ("Fix last change: only MinGW runtime 5.0.2 and later needs > >> that.") > > > > That's a surprise: I thought MinGW64 uses its own headers for 32-bit > > builds, whereas the above commits fix problems specific to mingw.org's > > headers. At the time, I looked at the MinGW64 headers, and my > > conclusion was that this particular problem doesn't exist there. > > We are miscommunicating. > > The MSYS2 mingw64 builds (i686 and x86_64) all work correctly. > The problem is with the MinGW (mingw.org, i686 only) builds. Sorry for my misunderstanding, now everything is clear. > This would all be a lot less confusing if the two unreleated projects > had chosen more distinctive names. Or didn't diverge in their headers. Agreed.