From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PL support Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 22:23:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83d07cewut.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <83imh5hby1.fsf@gnu.org> <2e4e8ce9-d857-f3e3-31cf-a40dee67bd25@yandex.ru> <83y2q1dsvh.fsf@gnu.org> <2468efa6-7dbd-8634-44cc-586bb6985f49@yandex.ru> <83pnbddrfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83k11ldpxs.fsf@gnu.org> <83imh5dnun.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7wpdms7.fsf@gnu.org> <88adcf52-7310-6d48-ab31-5d427deaa89d@yandex.ru> <65bfd7bb-34e5-53ca-a7c1-dfd0d22eeb9d@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="9265"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 09 21:24:01 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jXV4q-0002It-W6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 21:24:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59338 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXV4p-0004B2-TR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 15:23:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXV4O-0003kp-FB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 15:23:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58473) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXV4O-0001Dv-56; Sat, 09 May 2020 15:23:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4402 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jXV4N-00047s-Em; Sat, 09 May 2020 15:23:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <65bfd7bb-34e5-53ca-a7c1-dfd0d22eeb9d@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sat, 9 May 2020 22:12:06 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249558 Archived-At: > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , > emacs-devel > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 22:12:06 +0300 > > On 09.05.2020 21:47, João Távora wrote: > > >> That doesn't sound too bad. Bonus points if the same hooks could be > >> universal for the LSP protocol, i.e. if lsp-mode could conceivably use > >> them too. > > > > The thing is, you haven't exactly explained why Eglot in core sounds > > bad, either. You say Eglot in GNU Elpa is decent already and I agree. > > Imagine taking the whole of MELPA and putting it inside the Emacs > repository. Adding a couple of packages doesn't mean we want or need to add all of them. This is the case where redictio ad absurdum is NOT a good argument.