From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Confused by y-or-n-p Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 20:06:49 +0200 Message-ID: <83czyvkts6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834kkcr1eo.fsf@gnu.org> <43b24209-fa65-0e26-7cbd-f99175a7ffd8@gmx.at> <87wnx7j5is.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83im8qnyca.fsf@gnu.org> <83bleinmse.fsf@gnu.org> <56435592-d2d0-5fb6-977f-01e1931da835@gmx.at> <87k0t38g1z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7097"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 27 19:08:39 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ktaT9-0001je-9k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 19:08:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45416 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktaT8-0006xX-Cf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 13:08:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktaRi-0006QH-53 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 13:07:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ktaRg-00039Y-Gu; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 13:07:08 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1184 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ktaRX-0002Yq-Tp; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 13:07:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k0t38g1z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 27 Dec 2020 18:25:08 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:261912 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Cc: rms@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 18:25:08 +0200 > > The same way we could add a function with old implementation of 'y-or-n-p', > and depending on an option use either of them. So two new options are > needed: to select an implementation of y-or-n-p and and also an option > to choose either to use yes-or-no-p or y-or-n-p with shorter answers. Could you please make such a change?