From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current mode command discovery Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 15:54:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83czww2me9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v9aubm96.fsf@gnus.org> <87czwzfn9p.fsf@telefonica.net> <87eehfnd83.fsf@gnus.org> <1fb773f6-1480-53ce-08ae-1f7d0ba23428@yandex.ru> <87k0r637k4.fsf@gnus.org> <80e8c434-888d-23c5-13f0-c513bbf13ee4@yandex.ru> <8735xtznrh.fsf@gnus.org> <70fd2374-23ea-1c03-a4e4-97a370a41acf@yandex.ru> <87h7m9wjvl.fsf@gnus.org> <878s7kutzl.fsf@gnus.org> <83pn0w2qaf.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh00tevr.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8gg2pq9.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft1stdqp.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7m82n1c.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7m8rx0o.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21116"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 14:55:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lD6FP-0005IM-JM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:55:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50578 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD6FO-0005ni-JR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:55:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49132) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD6Ei-0004w2-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:54:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD6Eh-0006B3-Pw; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:54:23 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3262 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lD6Ef-0003ty-Oc; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:54:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h7m8rx0o.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:45:59 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265253 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:45:59 +0100 > > Dmitry asked whether using `put' as the mode specifier would increase > the size of the autoload files significantly (as opposed to how I > implemented it, which is to stick them in the interactive spec slot), > and I said that based on initial tagging, that's not really much of a > concern one way or another, because most ;;;###autoload functions are > global. > > I.e., changing the implementation to use `put' won't blow the size of > loaddefs.el up. > > So the minority status of ;;;###autoloaded mode-specific commands was > the entire point. A minority out of the number of commands we have can still be a substantial number, though.