From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:13:27 +0200 Message-ID: <83czvr9hvc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> <9088e12cb3de3d30abf1@heytings.org> <8735wnjsum.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg4n9jei.fsf@gnu.org> <271290d7aac58f2f9e96@heytings.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39660"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 19:20:05 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOP9o-000ADc-Ri for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 19:20:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48274 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOP9n-0003Hk-Pm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:20:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOP3R-0008MP-J0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:13:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36044) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOP3P-0001Lr-Pf; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:13:29 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1750 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lOP3K-0003QO-V3; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:13:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <271290d7aac58f2f9e96@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:55:31 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266776 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:55:31 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> I don't use `C-o' myself, so I can't really say to what degree this > >> would be annoying or not for users. Any `C-o' users who have an > >> opinion here? > > > > I use it _a_lot_. > > > > But of course, as you said a month ago: > > > > > This question also goes to everyone else in this long dispute who wants > > their precious key bindings preserved: why is such a long discussion > > needed when it is so easy to restore, in your init file, a binding you > > want preserved? Sure. But what I wrote then didn't prevent you-all from flooding this list with precisely the discussions I tried to prevent. And anyway, I was responding to Lars's question about the use of this key. I said nothing else.