From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Native Compilation And External Packages
Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 19:38:15 +0300
Message-ID: <83czt95wco.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <24754.27537.803673.706445@google.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="15634"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 29 18:38:38 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1ln1yw-0003wy-Fg
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 18:38:38 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58416 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1ln1yv-0001t1-40
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 12:38:37 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44334)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1ln1yS-0001Ez-Pd
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2021 12:38:08 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47014)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1ln1yS-0001yw-Hp; Sat, 29 May 2021 12:38:08 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1869
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1ln1yS-000791-4f; Sat, 29 May 2021 12:38:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <24754.27537.803673.706445@google.com> (raman@google.com)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270071
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/270071>

> From: "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>
> Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 09:28:01 -0700
> 
> Q: How does one write a Makefile rule for native compilation of .el
> files in a 3rd party (external) package?

Use something like

  emacs -batch -l comp -f batch-native-compile FOO.el

>    2. Would also be nice if warnings from byte-compilation could be
>       consistent with  native-compilation -- I'd be happy with either solution.

In what sense are they inconsistent now?  They come from
byte-compilation, AFAIU, so they are the same warnings you are used to
while byte-compiling...