From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 12:24:12 +0300 Message-ID: <83czpxorb7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83wno6p0op.fsf@gnu.org> <4FD0AA48-0E93-4E6A-BD65-C2E492322982@thornhill.no> <83zgt2ni07.fsf@gnu.org> <30BD0CDB-17B9-45DB-A77D-DA57E8535032@thornhill.no> <83k0k6neqq.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40157"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, danflscr@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Theodor Thornhill Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 11:25:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJuaZ-000ACr-Ka for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:25:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58370 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJuaX-0006SR-Qq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 05:25:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJuZl-0005Wr-AH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 05:24:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58458) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJuZg-0005tX-QP; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 05:24:29 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4657 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJuZg-0000tW-Cr; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 05:24:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Theodor Thornhill on Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:00:36 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273262 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:00:36 +0200 > From: Theodor Thornhill > CC: dgutov@yandex.ru, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, philipk@posteo.net, > danflscr@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> Yeah, not sure what these requirements are, though, apart from the pr workflow being recognizable across many GitHub derivatives. > > > >I think these are basically the various important aspects of the PR > >Web-based workflow. > > If that's the case I'd say it is covered. Dmitry seems to think otherwise, and he gave examples of such features, to which you agreed. > But it is different. And in my experience people have a hard time with different. But if inching a little closer to what GitHub does it our goal, then I'd say SourceHut covers it. If making it more accessible to webfolks is the goal, we will get more than halfway. Is that enough? No idea. We need to established whether it's enough, and if it isn't, either look for a better alternative, or somehow make sure SourceHut gets closer.