From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Allow applying filters to summary consecutively
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 19:23:52 +0200
Message-ID: <83cz9tpfpz.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <874jvaont2.fsf@autistici.org>
 <E1osynK-0004h8-36@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <83r0ybs07r.fsf@gnu.org> <E1otLm3-0007ay-5a@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <83r0y9q5j1.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAAeL0SSwHSKs_t8gxq6dQuxDK_j0_xp6TsQJ_vkzNWsafy9QuA@mail.gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="35853"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: rms@gnu.org, andrea.monaco@autistici.org, rpluim@gmail.com,
 emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 11 18:24:42 2022
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1otXlh-000963-It
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 18:24:41 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1otXkv-0001Z0-Ia; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:23:53 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1otXku-0001Yo-1W
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:23:52 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1otXks-000708-3L; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:23:50 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=XlzI+/IhMHr79igc89cW0ZR4uRc1dsSqldd9Dk+4t8Q=; b=XWKQITyXyhk5
 4wwiwvhVsljSU6coWpmKL/Vr6t5bMtHYrBY/mfr2SF0SJOrFF90WiqV9qbMxyyXmhBTmxdRrStGbu
 CCdXKG4JIIvKvApeQurIFcoiKxNcH0VvJlyY0VXESd/0mk1EtI0hpx2oUT4DHQ/Q+GoCdSMhGUkME
 RLfbJAh3us8IvCg3oQF4d29DTMH6+1/cStybOSzI8LzMgy3arpi0Ed5mW4VwYQANHHxBjwiPi8MQK
 O7Vsx7tqZhBbl6ih/TPXACKwvt4VxCGg012EvNAQyB26LuBsoeO80vN19E67yq5Opr103zKYYGqKU
 EvhLyfeFLPWXEo5fKF9vWw==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1otXkr-0008Mi-2D; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:23:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAAeL0SSwHSKs_t8gxq6dQuxDK_j0_xp6TsQJ_vkzNWsafy9QuA@mail.gmail.com>
 (message from Juanma Barranquero on Fri, 11 Nov 2022 15:59:10 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299577
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/299577>

> From: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 15:59:10 +0100
> Cc: rms@gnu.org, andrea.monaco@autistici.org, rpluim@gmail.com, 
>  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> > How do you describe the effect of applying a filter on top of one or more other filters?
> 
> Perhaps they "compose", using the verb in the meaning "to form (a whole) by ordering or arranging the
> parts".

Thanks, but that's not what this feature does.