From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-29 9b775ddc057 1/2: ; * etc/EGLOT-NEWS: Fix wording of last change. Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 13:46:24 +0300 Message-ID: <83cz375enz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <168335548287.8529.4912240840977468283@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <83h6spfose.fsf@gnu.org> <35df1362-fd92-9424-97d0-df3479414677@gutov.dev> <83edntfm6e.fsf@gnu.org> <667d5cc1-4a3c-5cd4-21c0-adff89cea769@gutov.dev> <834jopfdwz.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8h4elki.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6sofs02.fsf@posteo.net> <83r0rsebcf.fsf@gnu.org> <875y94f4eo.fsf@posteo.net> <834joodmaw.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7mwgd1x.fsf@posteo.net> <83y1m0c4zq.fsf@gnu.org> <87fs88gc5a.fsf@posteo.net> <83sfc7cbnx.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz3b6j6l.fsf@posteo.net> <838rdzc4zf.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz38fz8d.fsf@posteo.net> <87ild04fdt.fsf@posteo.net> <4e37dc2f-2642-cea2-152c-1c387ae82c6a@gutov.dev> <87h6sj2us4.fsf@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36169"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 11 12:46:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1px3oR-0009G0-CQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 12:46:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px3ns-0007jK-Hn; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:45:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px3nk-0007ih-Me for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:45:36 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px3nk-00018N-Du; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:45:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Te8MuHMKB81MrQS9TQME5VtrOTZCvVbAxFeIeaVJbKw=; b=UgyDzOuP3hDy yzXKVjsk5SJaSSoUgT63WkmYykbuxOnvk3UchwZBEQwBVi5hDU2fTZeaAv46VGQ4MI66y3XtO3LlD dxO1fAQcqigNNLcXPOe+JWcLMcXskH9+Eo+5kClnlhwOL98odpZv1sy08hcKClpoJboBkwgFSKhcv fP/88auZWnzzpzhYEE8PaU1emqu0M9h5XsaXQddhQDyVUb7VXcXu1jrHhDoAdgfHeITaBx56gbl8C mQVdK5tCpX8cSnRS4Gww799+xmFT5sNFiUsMDJ1JjdywCLAGKH6+huiRsVRCzGM6vFfmqzhjjIyRm VYRt/U8wjBXTwNkZpkvgGQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px3nP-0000vT-5D; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:45:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Thu, 11 May 2023 12:43:36 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:306056 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 12:43:36 +0300 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > On 11/05/2023 10:26, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > > Dmitry Gutov writes: > > > >> On 10/05/2023 14:03, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > >>> I noticed a bug, here is a revised version: > >> Should package-upgrade-all have a similar adjustment? > > Why not? Didn't you have a patch that extended > > `package--upgradeable-packages' by an optional argument, we could use > > that here an just pass `package-install-upgrade-built-in'. > > I'd be happy to see commit 53cc61d60db backported from master. Sorry, no, not in Emacs 29.1. > Not crazy about the idea of adding a prefix argument to package-upgrade, > though. Yes, I know. I'm not crazy either, but this issue should have been raised many moons earlier that it has been, and then we'd have a potentially better solution. As things are, we have no better choice but go forward a half-step.