Re: update-subdirs and lisp/term

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:37:36 +0200
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >> >> 
> >> >> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> > A remnant from past, perhaps, when lisp/term held only
> >> >> >> >> >> > terminal-specific files?
> >> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> >> Doesn't it still do?
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > No.
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> In which way?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > All of them.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> Please expand.  In which way is term/vt100.el not terminal-specific?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I didn't mean vt100.el (or its ilk).
> >> >> 
> >> >> ??? But it is one of them.
> >> >
> >> > Yes, but not the only one.
> >> 
> >> But you said "all of them", which includes vt100.el.
> >
> > "All of them" was a response to the question "in which way".  IOW,
> > "in all of the ways", not "all of the files".
> 
> But they are all terminal-specific in some way.

No, only some of them.  Others are non-specific in all ways.