From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: e and pi Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:07:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83bp7vz4w5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8739t9xpt2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874odoweqm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83hbhnz7z2.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284808092 27812 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2010 11:08:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 18 13:08:11 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwvH8-0007J9-HK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:08:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38353 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OwvH7-0000bF-Hw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:08:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51309 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OwvH2-0000a0-1D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwvH0-0007CG-Sr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:08:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:53193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwvH0-0007CC-MK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L8X00K00W5T8Y00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:07:34 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.210.149]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L8X00JTQW8KD590@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:07:34 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130392 Archived-At: > From: Helmut Eller > Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:21:02 +0200 > > > What you describe as a big surprise is actually known to every C/C++ > > programmer: some names are "reserved by the implementation" and should > > not be used by the application code. > > I don't see how that could be relevant here. It's relevant because such limitations are common in other languages.