From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#7517: 24.0.50; repeated crash under Mac OS X Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 17:40:45 +0200 Message-ID: <83bp40pr7m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tyic1uzh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87vd2dyzfj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4D1B22A1.6080202@swipnet.se> <4D1B27AF.7010701@swipnet.se> <4D1C6E7D.2040300@swipnet.se> <4D1D0172.8080404@swipnet.se> <4D1DB555.5080002@swipnet.se> <4D1DBD4A.6010303@swipnet.se> <83d3oiaysj.fsf@gnu.org> <4D1DD655.1040809@swipnet.se> <83aajmaxme.fsf@gnu.org> <4D1E5987.2000502@swipnet.se> <83oc80q1k4.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293896366 23597 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2011 15:39:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 15:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: u.s.reddy@cs.bham.ac.uk, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 7517@debbugs.gnu.org, jan.h.d@swipnet.se To: emacs user Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 01 16:39:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ3Y6-0001i9-Ts for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 16:39:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50415 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZ3Y6-0004ph-5L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:39:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49432 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZ3Y0-0004pP-P9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:39:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ3Xz-0004fv-CR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:39:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:57426) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZ3Xz-0004fr-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:39:11 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LEC00K00ORQ4K00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 17:38:38 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.127.157]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LEC00JQAOSBRG40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 17:38:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134114 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 14:46:24 +0200 > From: emacs user > Cc: Stefan Monnier , jan.h.d@swipnet.se, = 7517@debbugs.gnu.org,=20 > =09cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, u.s.reddy@cs.bham.ac= .uk >=20 > On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 > here is a bug report I just sent the vm maintainers now that I coul= d > edit the message thanks to your help. >=20 > Subject: =3D?iso-8859-8-i?B?+eXs5yDj5eD4IODs9+j45fDpOiBJTUdfMTYxNiw= gSU1HXzE2MTgsIElN?=3D > =3D?iso-8859-8-i?B?R18xNjIw?=3D >=20 > is displayed as >=20 > Subject: \371\345\354\347 \343\345\340\370 > \340\354\367\350\370\345\360\351: IMG_1616, IMG_1618, IMG_1620 >=20 > instead of >=20 > Subject: =D7=A9=D7=95=D7=9C=D7=97 =D7=93=D7=95=D7=90=D7=A8 =D7=90= =D7=9C=D7=A7=D7=98=D7=A8=D7=95=D7=A0=D7=99: IMG_1616, IMG_1618, IMG_1= 620 Thanks. It sounds like VM doesn't know about ISO-8859-8-i, is that right? I guess this bug report can be closed now. Any objections?