From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Move sha1 to C? Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:12:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83boyte16p.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306174374 6455 80.91.229.12 (23 May 2011 18:12:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 18:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 23 20:12:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QOZcX-0003BG-Tg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 20:12:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59317 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOZcX-0002l7-DU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:12:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOZcU-0002kr-Bz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:12:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOZcT-0000nz-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:12:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:39599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOZcT-0000nm-7p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:12:45 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LLN00G00UHBSW00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:12:16 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.254.13]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LLN00G58UKEPZ60@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:12:15 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139657 Archived-At: > From: Leo > Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 01:47:47 +0800 > > > Btw, if you can afford it, please consider making in > > src/makefile.w32-in and in lib/makefile.w32-in the changes equivalent > > to what you did in src/deps.mk and lib/gnulib.mk, respectively, to > > prevent the Windows build from breaking. TIA. > > Is the following sufficient? > > === modified file 'src/makefile.w32-in' > --- src/makefile.w32-in 2011-05-18 11:32:07 +0000 > +++ src/makefile.w32-in 2011-05-23 17:46:52 +0000 > @@ -866,6 +866,7 @@ > $(EMACS_ROOT)/nt/inc/unistd.h \ > $(EMACS_ROOT)/nt/inc/sys/time.h \ > $(EMACS_ROOT)/lib/md5.h \ > + $(EMACS_ROOT)/lib/sha1.h \ > $(LISP_H) \ > $(SRC)/atimer.h \ > $(SRC)/blockinput.h \ For src/makefile.w32-in, yes. For lib/makefile.w32-in, sha1.c should have its prerequisites added, and sha1.$(O) added to GNULIBOBJS. TIA